Management

 

calc orifcalc perc Calc primary fusion

 

Management

 

Operative versus non operative

 

Buckley et al JBJS Am 2002

- RCT of 309 displaced intra-articular fractures

- operative v non operative management with 2 year follow up

- extensile lateral approach and fixation with 1/3 tubular plate

- 2 year follow up

- overall no difference in outcomes

- better outcomes with operative: Type II / non workers compensation / women / < 29 / anatomic reduction

 

Griffin et al BMJ 2014

- RCT of 151 intra-articular fractures

- operative versus nonoperative for displaced intra-articular fractures

- no difference in outcomes

 

Zhang et al J Orthop Trauma 2016

- meta-analysis of 7 RCTs and 900 patients

- operative versus nonoperative for displaced intra-articular fractures

- no difference in most outcomes

- increased complications with operative management

- better shoe wear and walking ability with operative management

 

Non Operative Management

 

Indications

 

Sander I - non displaced

Sanders IV

Diabetes / smoker / peripheral vascular disease

Compound fractures

 

Technique

 

Cast / boot

NWB 6/52

 

Complications

 

Subtalar OA

Calcaneocuboid arthritis

Hindfoot varus malunion

Peroneal impingement or subluxation

Posterior tibial nerve entrapment

Difficulty with shoe wear

 

calc malunion

 

Operative Management

 

Aims

 

Pain free functional foot that can fit in a shoe

 

Goals

 

1.  Restore heel shape (height, length / width / valgus)

2.  Reduce joint surface

 

Options

 

ORIF via extensile lateral approach

Minimally invasive ORIF via sinus tarsi approach

Percutaneous fixation

Intramedullary nail

Primary subtalar arthrodesis

 

Results

 

Extensile lateral approach versus minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach

 

Nosewicz et al Foot Ankle Surg 2019

- systematic review of extensile lateral versus sinus tarsi approach

- 9 studies and 700 patients

- wound healing issues extensile lateral: 25%

- wound healing issues sinus tarsi 5%

- no difference functional outcomes

 

Calc approachCalc approach

 

Screws versus plate in MIS vis sinus tarsi approach

 

Zhao et al Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2024

- systematic review of fixation via sinus tarsi approach

- screw versus plate fixation in 7 studies and 700 patients

- no difference outcomes

- better reduction with plates

 

Percutaneous fixation versus extensile lateral approach

 

DeWall et al J Orthop Trauma 2010

- RCT of 125 fractures

- percutaneous fixation versus extensile lateral approach

- deep infection 6/42 extensile lateral

- deep infection 0% percutaneous fixation

 

Percutaneous fixation versus MIS / sinus tarsi

 

Feng et al BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2016

- RCT of 80 patients

- percutaneous screws v sinus tarsi approach / plate

- comparable clinical outcomes

- better restoration of heel width with sinus tarsi approach

 

Nail versus plate

 

Fu et al J Dis Relat Surg 2024

- systematic review of 5 controlled studies and 473 patients

- IM nail versus plate

- no difference in outcome

- lower total complications and wound issues with nail

 

Primary subtalar fusion

 

Patel et al J Foot Ankle Surg 2021

- systematic review 500 ORIF v 60 primary fusion for Type II/III

- better functional outcomes with ORIF

 

Buckley et al J Orthop Trauma 2014

- RCT of 31 patients with Type IV

- ORIF v primary fusion

- no difference in outcome

 

ORIF lateral plate using extensile lateral approach

 

Calc orifcalc orifc

 

Synthessynthes calc plate

Depuy Synthes calcaneal locking plates PDF

 

Technique

 

AO surgery reference extensile lateral approach

 

AO surgery calcaneal ORIF lateral plate

 

Vumedi ORIF calcaneum via extensile lateral approach

 

Position

- patient on side, blankets under foot

- operated foot up

- radiolucent table, image intensifier

 

Extensile lateral approach

- vertical limb: between tendoachilles and fibula

- horizontal limb: in line with 5th metatarsal towards CC joint

- full thickness flaps - care ++++ with apex of incision

- divide peroneal retinaculum

- peroneal tendons elevated

 

K wires to retract skin flap

- 2 in talus / 1 in fibula

 

Expose subtalar joint

 

Reduction of varus

- Steinmann pin into tuberosity

- can elevate and pull out of varus

 

Reduction of subtalar joint

- open lateral wall fragment to access to subtalar joint

- lamina spreader

- reduce and ORIF with screws

- reduce and ORIF sustentaculum fragment

 

Anatomical contoured locking plate

 

Calc ORIFCalcaneal ORIF Axial

 

Minimally invasive surgery via sinus tarsi approach

 

Arthrex plateArthrex MISMIS

Arthrex MIS calcaneal plating system

 

Acumed calcAcumed calc

Acumed MIS calcaneal plating system

 

Technique

 

AO surgery sinus tarsi approach

 

AO surgery MIS calcaneal ORIF via sinus tarsi

 

MIS sinus tarsi technique article

 

Vumedi MIS calcaneum fracture via sinus tarsi

 

Vumedi MIS calcaneum fracture via sinus tarsi 2

 

Sinus tarsi approach

- subfibular approach

- centred on subtalar joint

- peroneal and sural nerve inferior

- reflect extensor digitorum brevis

 

Distraction device

 

Reduce tuberosity with Schantz pin

 

Reduce and ORIF posterior facet / sustenaculum talus

 

Use lateral plate with minimally invasive techniques

 

Results

 

Stulik et al JBJS Br 2006

- 287 displaced intra-articular fractures

- MUA / Gissane spike percutanous reduction / K wire fixation

- 72% good or excellent results

- 1.7% deep infection, 7% superficial infection

 

Percutaneous Fixation

 

calc perc

 

Technique

 

Needs to be performed 3 - 5 days after injury while fracture fragments mobile

 

Surgical technique PDF

 

Vumedi percutaneous fixation calcaneal fractures

 

Intramedullary nail

 

C-Nail

 

C-nailC-nail

Medin you-tube C-nail animated surgical technique

 

Vumedi C-nail surgical technique

 

Reduction

- tuberosity Schantz pin

- percutaneous reduction / K wire fixation or

- sinus tarsi approach to reduce and screw fixate posterior facet

 

Insertion

- below achilles tendon

- aim towards CC joint

 

Primary Subtalar Arthrodesis

 

Calc IVCalc IVCalc IV

 

Calc fusioncalc fusion

 

Indications

 

Type III / IV Sanders

 

Complications

 

General

 

Wound necrosis

Sural nerve injury

Compartment Syndrome

RSD

Non union

 

Infection

 

infect calc ORIFinfect calc

 

infect calcinfect calc

 

Buckley et al JBJS Am 2002

- RCT of 309 displaced intra-articular fractures

- operative v non operative management with 2 year follow up

- 5% deep infection

- 17% superficial infection

 

Osteoarthritis

 

Calc OACalc OA

 

Buckley et al JBJS Am 2002

- RCT of 309 displaced intra-articular fractures

- operative v non operative management with 2 year follow up

- STJ arthrodesis: non operative 17%, operative 3%

 

Calcaneal Malunion

 

calc malunion

 

Issues

 

Varus hindfoot - locks midfoot

Peroneal impingement

Shoewear problems

 

Options

 

Lateral wall exostectomy and peroneal tenolysis

Calcaneal osteotomy

STJ arthrodesis

 

Osteotomy for calcaneal malunion surgical technique PDF

 

Vumedi calcaneal osteotomy for malunion video

 

Results

 

Farouk et al Foot Ankle Int 2019

- 18 varus calcaneal malunions

- combined subtalar joint fusion / calcaneal osteotomy / lateral wall exostectomy

- outcome score increased from 60 to 80