Management

 

HSHS

 

Operative management

 

Options

 

Arthroscopic labral repair +/-  Remplissage

Glenoid bony block procedure 

- Latarjet / Bristow

- free autograft / allograft

Hill Sachs allograft

 

Decision making factors

 

Glenoid bone loss

Humeral bone loss

Hill Sachs

Patient factors Sports Ligamentous laxity

 

Critical > 20 - 25%

 

> 30% articular surface Age < 20 Contact sports  

 

Subcritical 10 - 20%

 

Engaging Hill Sachs

- bipolar bone lesions

- off track lesions

Male Competitive sports  

 

Zhang et al J Orthop Surg Res 2022

- systematic review of risk factors of recurrence after Bankart repair

- < 20 years, Hill-Sachs lesion, glenoid bone lesion, shoulder hyperlaxity, off-track lesion, male sex, contact sports

 

Instability Severity Index Score

 

6 preoperative factors to generate score out of 10

- attempts to predict success of arthroscopic stabilization procedure

 

Issues

- unclear why some factors worth more than others

- measurement of Hill Sachs / glenoid bone loss on xray

 

Age Degree of sport Type of sport Shoulder Hyperlaxity Hill Sachs on xray Loss of glenoid contour on xray
< 20 2 points Competitive 2 Contact 1 Hyperlaxity 1 Visible on ER 2 Loss of contour 2
> 20 0 points Recreational 0 Other 0 Normal 0 Not visible 0 No loss 0

 

Loppini et al Arthroscopy 2019

- 670 arthroscopic Bankart repairs

- overall recurrence 17%

- ISIS < 3: 94% success

- ISIS 4 - 6: 86% success

- ISIS > 6: 55%

 

Glenoid bone loss

 

Incidence

 

Sugaya et al JBJS Am 2003

- 3D CT of 100 consecutive shoulder instability

- 50% osseous Bankart lesion

- one large (25% glenoid)

- 54% medium size (10% glenoid)

- 44% small (3% glenoid)

 

Critical / subcritical bone loss

 

Shaha et al AJSM 2025

- consecutive series of arthroscopic Bankart repair

- worsened outcomes with increasing glenoid bone loss

- 3% v 10% v 16% v 25%

 

Best fit circle measurement

 

Best fit circle over inferior glenoid

- perpendicular line through center of circle

- measure percentage bone loss

 

bony bankartBony bankart

10 - 15% defect

 

Bony bankartBony bankart

20 - 25% defect

 

Bony bankartBony bankart

20 - 25% defect

 

Engaging Hill Sachs

 

Incidence

 

Yiannakopoulos et al Arthroscopy 2007

- 127 shoulder dislocations

- 88% Hill Sachs

 

Measurement Hill Sachs

 

Best fit circle of the articular surface of humeral head

Measure percentage involvement of articular surface

 

Hill SachsHill Sachs Measurement

 

HSHS

 

Engaging Hill Sachs

 

Concept

- Hill Sachs lesion engages with anterior glenoid in abduction / external rotation

- complex interplay between glenoid bone loss and humeral bone loss / bipolar bone loss

 

Glenoid track is 83% of glenoid width of intact glenoid

- subtract any glenoid bone loss

- 83%D - d

- this distance from medial rotator cuff foot print on humeral head

- engaging or off track lesion: Hill Sachs medial to medial border of this line

- non engaging or on track lesion: Hill Sachs medial border lateral to medial border of this line

 

HSHS

 

hsHS

Engaging Hill Sachs in setting of bipolar bone lesion

 

Adriani et al KSSTA 2025

- systematic review of modalities for glenoid track / bipolar bone lesions

- 3D CT most accurate

- reliability of 2D MRI unclear

 

Arthroscopic labral repair +/- Remplissage

 

Indications

 

Minimal glenoid bone loss

Non contact athlete

 

Remplissage

 

Tenodesis of infraspinatus into Hill Sachs defect

Makes defect extra-articular / non engaging

 

Results

 

Remplissage

 

Villareal-Espinosa et al KSSTA 2024

- systematic review of Bankart repair v Bankart + Remplissage

- reduced recurrent instability with Bankart + Remplissage with no difference in ROM

 

Arthroscopic Bankart v Glenoid bone block procedure

 

Gouveia et al Arthroscopy 2019

- systematic review of 10 - 15% mean glenoid bone loss

- recurrence arthroscopic bankart: 6 - 13%

- recurrence bone block: 0 - 8%

- complication arthroscopic bankart: 0 - 2%

- complication bone block: 0 - 67%

 

Iman et al AJSM 2021

- systematic review of arthroscopic bankart v Latarjet

- high recurrence with arthroscopic bankart

- higher injection with Latarjet

 

Glenoid bone block procedures

 

Indications

 

Critical glenoid bone loss 20 - 25%

Subcritical bone loss / bipolar bone lesions / engaging Hill Sachs

Contact athlete

 

Results

 

Latarjet versus free bone block procedures

 

Gilat et al AJSM 2021

- systematic review of 3900 Latarjet versus 600 free bone block procedures

- recurrent instability: Latarjet 5%, FBB 3%

- complications: Latarjet 4%, FBB 5%

- OA: Latarjet 12%, FBB 4%

- return to sport: Latarjet 73%, FBB 88%

 

Distal tibial allograft (DTA)

 

Singh et al AJSM 2025

- systematic review of DTA for shoulder instability with bone loss

- 8 studies and 329 patients

- recurrent instability 1.5%

- complication rate 7%

- hardware complications 4%

- graft resorption 37%

 

Free autograft versus free allograft

 

Gilat et al KSSTA 2021

- systematic review

- free autograft (iliac crest / free coracoid) versus free allograft (DTA / iliac crest / femoral head)

- recurrent instability 3% with no difference between groups

- autograft: 11% OA

- allograft: 1% OA

 

Humeral head allograft

 

Indications

 

Large Hill Sachs defect

 

Technique

 

HIll SachsHSHS

 

Humeral Head Allograft APHumeral Head Allograft Lateral.jpg